Should have review rating... to stop potentially subscribers from wasting money and time
What Would You Change Or Improve On Onlyfans/just4fans?
- Thread starter LPSG Support
- Start date
this. I should be able to search for guys based on names and categories.
And the videos need to be faster.
Also. We should be able to aeee some preview images. Sometimes people recommend an OF but I just see a pic of a leg and I have no idea what their face looks like so why subscribe?
Jff interface needs to be better at scrolling through the content
The thing with OnlyFans is that it only really works on a small scale. If there's just one person who you're really really into, and they post regular content, then maybe you don't mind paying $10 a month to get their content and feel like you're helping to support them.
For most people that isn't the case though. There are a ton of performers who they kinda like, and want to see the content of, but even if you were inclined to pay to begin with it gets prohibitively expensive very quickly. You compound that with the fact that many of the performers don't update regularly, or post low quality content, and you can easily see how we get into a situation where people choose to share content.
As a consumer it makes more sense to subscribe to just one performer, and then get together which a bunch of people who've eached subscribed to a different performer themselves, and all share out the content. Each person covers one subscription fee, but as a group they get to enjoy seeing dozens of different performers. That's how file sharing sites have operated for years, but obviously it's not great for the content creators.
The logical way around this would be to take the same approach with OnlyFans that the music and movie industries have taken to try to reduce file sharing. These days you don't go out and buy 100 different songs for $1 each, you pay a small monthly fee to Spotify or Google Play to stream decades worth of different music. You don't build a DVD collection at $20 a pop, you pay a monthly fee to Netflix or Amazon Prime and you get access to a huge library of films and TV shows.
A good OnlyFans type site is going to require a flat fee, and access to all the performers on there. The only hard part will be convincing the performers of the merit of the model, and figuring out how to fairly compensate them. I know that a lot of artists complain about how little they receive from Spotify per play of their tracks, etc. You've got to make it worthwhile for performers or they won't use the platform, and you have to reward the ones who make regular high quality content, and receive a lot of views in turn, by giving them a bigger chunk of the profit pot.
For most people that isn't the case though. There are a ton of performers who they kinda like, and want to see the content of, but even if you were inclined to pay to begin with it gets prohibitively expensive very quickly. You compound that with the fact that many of the performers don't update regularly, or post low quality content, and you can easily see how we get into a situation where people choose to share content.
As a consumer it makes more sense to subscribe to just one performer, and then get together which a bunch of people who've eached subscribed to a different performer themselves, and all share out the content. Each person covers one subscription fee, but as a group they get to enjoy seeing dozens of different performers. That's how file sharing sites have operated for years, but obviously it's not great for the content creators.
The logical way around this would be to take the same approach with OnlyFans that the music and movie industries have taken to try to reduce file sharing. These days you don't go out and buy 100 different songs for $1 each, you pay a small monthly fee to Spotify or Google Play to stream decades worth of different music. You don't build a DVD collection at $20 a pop, you pay a monthly fee to Netflix or Amazon Prime and you get access to a huge library of films and TV shows.
A good OnlyFans type site is going to require a flat fee, and access to all the performers on there. The only hard part will be convincing the performers of the merit of the model, and figuring out how to fairly compensate them. I know that a lot of artists complain about how little they receive from Spotify per play of their tracks, etc. You've got to make it worthwhile for performers or they won't use the platform, and you have to reward the ones who make regular high quality content, and receive a lot of views in turn, by giving them a bigger chunk of the profit pot.
I don't like profile pages of performers. You only see a small profile image, you can't even see it biggger. And you can't have a clue about the type of content the performer posts. You can't see a few seconds of a video or a pixelated image. You have to find these performers through other websites like Twitter. And that's not good imo
They should make the post's visible at least in a thumbnail size so you can if it is adult content,
The ability to report people who are clearly baiting their followers on social media with the "promise" of "see it uncensored on onlyfans", I think this should also be something you can report on instagram. it will stop people from using fake pics or censored pics to scam.
I think onlyfans/justforfans etc should have an algorithm that pics up on the comments users get and automatically puts an icon on someone's page that show's the content is X-rated or that they are a scammer, I know this may hurt the profit that these sites makes and I know they say people can post whatever, do whatever, say whatever, to get followers. But it needs to change.
Forums like LPSG are great because people get called out all the time on here for scamming or baiting. but it is often to late for many people who have already subscribed to someone.
I think there also needs to be a requirement on how much people need to post on these sites to justify the money they charge and if they fail to meet those requirements onlyfans/justforfans/etc drop the price automatically and it can't be increased until content increases. it should also do this if a user is posting to much of the same content.
The ability to report people who are clearly baiting their followers on social media with the "promise" of "see it uncensored on onlyfans", I think this should also be something you can report on instagram. it will stop people from using fake pics or censored pics to scam.
I think onlyfans/justforfans etc should have an algorithm that pics up on the comments users get and automatically puts an icon on someone's page that show's the content is X-rated or that they are a scammer, I know this may hurt the profit that these sites makes and I know they say people can post whatever, do whatever, say whatever, to get followers. But it needs to change.
Forums like LPSG are great because people get called out all the time on here for scamming or baiting. but it is often to late for many people who have already subscribed to someone.
I think there also needs to be a requirement on how much people need to post on these sites to justify the money they charge and if they fail to meet those requirements onlyfans/justforfans/etc drop the price automatically and it can't be increased until content increases. it should also do this if a user is posting to much of the same content.
3 things:
1. OF suggests other accounts & frequently I'll check them out but with only the 1 header image to go on it's hard to make a determination of whether or not I want to subscribe. I then have to go off site, research them in google & this is definitely a barrier to joining. If the header had 3-5 scrolling images it may be a little easier, or make a few posts free. I think Patreon has a version of this, streaming & vid is locked behind paywall but some content, still images, etc. anyone who is following (but not subbed) can view.
2. Searching within OF is difficult, it has to be exact spelling and given half the words are portmanteaux that's useless. Again, in order to search a performer I have to go off site, search & return
3. OF could quit with making you re-log in every 2 months. For some reason Chrome doesn't store the password and I always have to go through some rigamarole to reset it and as a casual user frequently I'll just not log on. It's the only site I can think of that does this (LPSG I believe has only asked for my UN/PW once as far as I can tell unless I cleared cache)
Good luck
1. OF suggests other accounts & frequently I'll check them out but with only the 1 header image to go on it's hard to make a determination of whether or not I want to subscribe. I then have to go off site, research them in google & this is definitely a barrier to joining. If the header had 3-5 scrolling images it may be a little easier, or make a few posts free. I think Patreon has a version of this, streaming & vid is locked behind paywall but some content, still images, etc. anyone who is following (but not subbed) can view.
2. Searching within OF is difficult, it has to be exact spelling and given half the words are portmanteaux that's useless. Again, in order to search a performer I have to go off site, search & return
3. OF could quit with making you re-log in every 2 months. For some reason Chrome doesn't store the password and I always have to go through some rigamarole to reset it and as a casual user frequently I'll just not log on. It's the only site I can think of that does this (LPSG I believe has only asked for my UN/PW once as far as I can tell unless I cleared cache)
Good luck
Brian S
Worshipped Member
- Joined
- Aug 4, 2015
- Posts
- 1,803
- Media
- 5
- Likes
- 12,362
- Points
- 333
- Age
- 45
- Location
- Nebraska (United States)
- Sexuality
- 100% Gay, 0% Straight
- Gender
- Male
As someone who writes on patreon, but does not subscribe to any OF accounts:
Patreon has tiers. Anyone can read my basic content for the cheapest tier rate (that I set the prices of.) But for extras, those are reserved for higher-paying members. The $10 tier is where you can get everything I post there. I get to select which tiers can see any individual post I make. For instance, if it's a bonus story, that only goes to my higher tier, so I unclick the lower tiers.
I have little interest in OF, but the majority of that is due to the horror stories I've heard. Maybe a new service could include a payment tier such as patreon? Perhaps it would give subscribers impetus to pay a higher rate after seeing the lower-tier media, and perhaps it would spur the creators to do more "bonus" content for their higher-paying fans?
To improve Onlyfans as a platform, they should allow the Feeds to be revealed as the permanent and only option. Currently, the Model can Enable the time-line feed that’s shaded in gray until you subscribe. They should also allow users to see the length of each video on the gray-outed feeds. So subscribes can see how long the videos are and how frequently they post before they subscribe.
Too many models are taking advantage of their fans by uploading short snapchat styled clips that’s less than 10 seconds. Even if they have uploaded 80 videos. It won’t manner. If each video is less than 10 seconds, then you can barely walk away with 20 minutes worth of content. And it might have taken the model several months to accumulate that total.
They can get rid of that predatorial behavior with my suggestions. And more importantly Models that actually upload great content and post lengthy videos will get greater recognition.
The top two concerns that most users have: Do they post frequently? And how long are the videos? A lot of people refrain from subscribing because they’re fearful of those two lingering questions. Onlyfans is in business in making money. But they need to get ride of the “Gotcha” mentality from their Models.
And maybe an added field that will force models to reveal if their page will have full frontal nudity or porn on the “edit profile” section. Instagram models love to trick ya into believing it’s going to be xxx rated. So maybe when they fill out their profile, have a required field that will force models to tell us what kinds content will be on their page.
Too many models are taking advantage of their fans by uploading short snapchat styled clips that’s less than 10 seconds. Even if they have uploaded 80 videos. It won’t manner. If each video is less than 10 seconds, then you can barely walk away with 20 minutes worth of content. And it might have taken the model several months to accumulate that total.
They can get rid of that predatorial behavior with my suggestions. And more importantly Models that actually upload great content and post lengthy videos will get greater recognition.
The top two concerns that most users have: Do they post frequently? And how long are the videos? A lot of people refrain from subscribing because they’re fearful of those two lingering questions. Onlyfans is in business in making money. But they need to get ride of the “Gotcha” mentality from their Models.
And maybe an added field that will force models to reveal if their page will have full frontal nudity or porn on the “edit profile” section. Instagram models love to trick ya into believing it’s going to be xxx rated. So maybe when they fill out their profile, have a required field that will force models to tell us what kinds content will be on their page.
That’s a horrible idea. The streaming/music model would not work in this situation lol... Models wouldn’t get paid. I want the models that I personally support to get what they earned. This idea would be horrible for African American and Latino models. If they created a similar system, the large majority of the profits would go to White female performers and White gay men. It wouldn’t be sustainable. No, each subscription should be separate.
Now, if models want to participate in some type of “bundle” option, where they can offer a discount if you join their page and their “friends”, that would be cool. Many of these models are also friendly toward each other and some even worked together. So maybe onlyfans can give them collaborative tools.
Like I said reveal a thumb nail not a grey patch, "models" can't hide behind that and scam people
oh sorry. I didn’t read anything you wrote prior to writing my own suggestions. It’s pretty much the same opinions all across the board. Those like me, whom have experience over the last 3 yrs with connectpal, then onlyfans and now justfor.fans pretty much understand the culture and know what’s needed for it to improve.
I started to write onlyfans reviews 2 yrs ago to help curve the fraud. But most of my Reviews was deleted when I was banned for sharing a file sharing link (at the time, I didn’t know it was against the rules).
I totally agree with you, was just pointing out my suggestion for visible thumbnails.
I have been scammed to and have seen so many warnings on here and on other social media so I choose to avoid paying for a subscription. Onlyfans seems to be a legal of scamming and conning people out of their money by offering them something the desperately want.
- An app - why is there still no OF app? Logging in to the website every time I want to use it is ridiculous.
- A video player that works - it’s been around 2 years since OnlyFans started and their video player is still just as bad. The website as a whole sucks as well actually.
- Definitely public reviews - Perhaps subscribers are offered the opportunity to make a review each time their subscription renews and when someone cancels their subscription and they’re asked why, that can be displayed.
- Tips - I hate this feature of OF. Private conversations leading to a member asking for x amount of $ for a dick pick that they never fulfil. Perhaps there could be an ‘extras’ feature where the model can list what a user can get for x amount of $. This can then be tracked and if the user does not receive what they’ve paid for they can get a refund.
- Inactive - perhaps if a user is inactive for a certain amount of days, all subscribers receive a refund for that month?
good points but they need to remove the tips feature and the posting in private messages feature. You should only be allowed to post in your feed and as I have stated previously if you want to charge $10 a month there are posting requirements, failure leads to refunds for anyone sub'd in that month or they decrease your subscription value until you meet the posting the requirements. the more $$ you ask for the more you need to post.
You should be made to outline what you are posting and if you say xxx and your content isn't you get penalised for scamming or conning people and you get a visible mark against your profile so people can see you have a history of lying.
I think comments should be visible at all times even to people who aren't subscribed and comments should be allowed to be deleted by the account holder unless the comment goes against the sites T&C's
making people accountable is the only way to change and improve something.
But my advice, no matter who they are or what they are posting search this forum site or google before subscribing and honestly, even if they do post xxx content, I still wouldn't bother wasting your money. I know of a user who posts once a week and it is pretty much the same thing every week, but tells fans he'll be showing more soon and never does.
yea it’s unfortunate that companies like Apple and Google can discriminate against porn companies in this ountry by banning XXX Apps. It’s not Onlyfans fault.
Similar threads
